Noah Mitchell Noah Mitchell's Profile Page

Noah Mitchell Noah Mitchell

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

Pass Guaranteed Professional FAAA_004 - Latest Pure Storage FlashArray Architect Associate Test Cram

One of the top features of Pure Storage FAAA_004 exam dumps is the FAAA_004 exam passing a money-back guarantee. In other words, your investments with Pure Storage FAAA_004 exam questions are secured with the 100 Pure Storage FlashArray Architect Associate FAAA_004 exam passing a money-back guarantee. Due to any reason, if you did not succeed in the final Pure Storage FAAA_004 exam despite using Pure Storage FAAA_004 PDF Questions and practice tests, we will return your whole payment without any deduction. While practicing on Pure Storage FlashArray Architect Associate FAAA_004 practice test software you will experience the real-time Pure Storage FlashArray Architect Associate FAAA_004 exam environment for preparation. This will help you to understand the pattern of final Pure Storage FAAA_004 exam questions and answers.

Our company has employed a lot of leading experts in the field to compile the FAAA_004 exam question. Our system of team-based working is designed to bring out the best in our people in whose minds and hands the next generation of the best FAAA_004 exam torrent will ultimately take shape. Our company has a proven track record in delivering outstanding after sale services and bringing innovation to the guide torrent. Your success is guaranteed for our experts can produce world class FAAA_004 Guide Torrent for our customers. You will be bound to pass the FAAA_004 exam.

>> Latest FAAA_004 Test Cram <<

Professional Latest FAAA_004 Test Cram & Passing FAAA_004 Exam is No More a Challenging Task

Creativity is coming from the passion and love of knowledge. Every day there are many different new things turning up. So a wise and diligent person should absorb more knowledge when they are still young. At present, our FAAA_004 study prep has gained wide popularity among different age groups. Most of them are consistently learning different things. Therefore, we sincerely wish you can attempt to our FAAA_004 Test Question. Practice and diligence make perfect. Every one looks forward to becoming an excellent person. You will become the lucky guys after passing the FAAA_004 exam.

Pure Storage FAAA_004 Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic
Details

Topic 1

Array Monitoring and Architecture: This section measures the skills of Storage Architects and covers explaining FlashArray's high availability architecture, defining FlashArray features (e.g., ActiveCluster, ActiveDR), explaining data reduction methods, identifying components of FlashArrays, and analyzing performance metrics and capacity usage using Pure1 Manage3. A crucial skill evaluated is "analyzing performance metrics".

Topic 2

Subscriptions and DX: This section evaluates the competencies of Account Managers regarding Pure Storage's subscription services and digital experience. It focuses on identifying the benefits of Pure's Evergreen program (Evergreen
One,
Forever,
Flex) and Love Your Storage Guarantee, as well as determining future capacity, performance, and upgrade requirements through workload and hardware simulations.

Topic 3

Qualify, Sell, and Architect: This section of the exam assesses the skills of Technical Sales Engineers and covers identifying solutions based on customer requirements, sizing solutions based on customer needs using tools like Pure FlashArray Sizer, identifying market trends and opportunities (e.g., Ransomware and Portworx Solution Centers), demonstrating an understanding of FlashArray use cases, and demonstrating an understanding of unified storage on FlashArray37. A key skill measured is "identifying solutions based on customer requirements.

Pure Storage FlashArray Architect Associate Sample Questions (Q30-Q35):

NEW QUESTION # 30
A customer currently has a FlashArray//X for their block storage with 40 TB of available storage. They need 10 TB of file workloads and want to spend the least amount possible on infrastructure.
What should the SE recommend?

A. NDU the FlashArray //X to a //XL and run both workloads there
B. Run both workloads on the current FlashArray
C. Add another disk pool for file storage to their current FlashArray
D. Purchase an entry level FlashBlade for the file workload

Answer: B

Explanation:
The customer currently has a FlashArray//X with 40 TB of available block storage and needs to add 10 TB of file workloads while minimizing infrastructure costs. Let's analyze the options:
Analysis of Options:
A . Run both workloads on the current FlashArray :
Pure Storage FlashArray supports both block and file workloads using the Purity File Services feature, which allows customers to run file workloads directly on their FlashArray.
Since the FlashArray already has 40 TB of available storage, adding 10 TB of file workloads is feasible without requiring additional hardware. This is the most cost-effective solution.
B . Add another disk pool for file storage to their current FlashArray :
Adding a separate disk pool for file storage is unnecessary because Purity File Services can handle both block and file workloads on the same array.
C . Purchase an entry-level FlashBlade for the file workload :
While FlashBlade is designed for file and object workloads, purchasing a new FlashBlade would be significantly more expensive than leveraging the existing FlashArray. This option does not align with the customer's goal of minimizing costs.
D . NDU the FlashArray //X to a //XL and run both workloads there :
Upgrading the FlashArray//X to a FlashArray//XL via a Non-Disruptive Upgrade (NDU) is unnecessary for this use case. The current FlashArray//X has sufficient capacity to handle both workloads, and upgrading to a higher-tier array would increase costs unnecessarily.
Recommendation:
The most cost-effective solution is A. Run both workloads on the current FlashArray , leveraging Purity File Services to support the file workload.
Reference:
Purity File Services Documentation :
Purity File Services
Explains how to configure and use file services on FlashArray.
FlashArray Use Cases :
FlashArray Use Cases
Highlights the versatility of FlashArray for both block and file workloads.

NEW QUESTION # 31
A manufacturing customer is running Oracle volumes on their existing //X90R3 array and would like to use FlashArray for their Windows file shares. They are asking if it is feasible to do this.
How should the SE respond?

A. The customer needs to upgrade to XL to be able to use FA File.
B. The customer should migrate their Windows file servers to Pure.
C. The customer should be able to use their current FlashArray.

Answer: C

Explanation:
The SE should respond that the customer can use their current FlashArray for Windows file shares alongside their existing Oracle workloads. Pure Storage FlashArray is a versatile platform capable of supporting multiple workloads, including block storage for databases (e.g., Oracle) and file services for Windows file shares.
Why This Matters:
FlashArray Versatility:
Pure Storage FlashArray supports both block and file workloads through its integrated architecture. While FlashArray is primarily known for block storage, it can also support file workloads using FA File Services , which provides NFS and SMB protocols for file sharing.
The customer does not need to migrate their Windows file servers or upgrade their hardware unless there are specific capacity or performance constraints.
Current Array Feasibility:
Assuming the existing //X90R3 array has sufficient capacity and performance headroom, it can handle the additional workload without requiring upgrades.
Why Not the Other Options?
A . The customer should migrate their Windows file servers to Pure:
While migrating file servers to Pure Storage can provide benefits like simplified management and improved performance, it is not a requirement. The customer can continue using their existing file servers while leveraging FlashArray for block storage.
B . The customer needs to upgrade to XL to be able to use FA File:
Upgrading to a higher-end model like FlashArray//XL is unnecessary unless the current array lacks the required capacity or performance for the additional workload. The //X90R3 is fully capable of supporting FA File Services.
Key Points:
Versatility: FlashArray can support both block and file workloads simultaneously.
No Immediate Upgrades Needed: The current array can likely handle the additional workload without requiring hardware changes.
Workload Consolidation: Using a single platform for multiple workloads simplifies infrastructure and reduces costs.
Reference:
Pure Storage FlashArray Documentation: "FA File Services Overview"
Pure Storage Whitepaper: "Consolidating Workloads on FlashArray"
Pure Storage Knowledge Base: "Supporting Multiple Workloads with FlashArray"

NEW QUESTION # 32
A potential healthcare customer wants to move to a modern storage array for their medical records database. They need the fastest possible array as their workload is highly transactional.
Which solution should an SE recommend?

A. FlashArray//X
B. FlashArray//C
C. FlashArray//XL

Answer: C

Explanation:
To meet the healthcare customer's requirement for the fastest possible array for a highly transactional medical records database, FlashArray//XL is the optimal choice. Here's why:
Analysis of FlashArray Models:
FlashArray//XL :
The FlashArray//XL is Pure Storage's highest-performance all-flash storage array, designed for mission-critical, high-transaction workloads that demand ultra-low latency and maximum throughput.
It offers the highest IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second), bandwidth, and capacity scaling capabilities in the FlashArray family, making it ideal for workloads like medical records databases that require extreme performance.
With its advanced NVMe architecture and DirectFlash Modules, FlashArray//XL delivers sub-millisecond latency and exceptional performance consistency, which are critical for transactional workloads.
FlashArray//X :
The FlashArray//X is a high-performance all-flash array but is positioned below the FlashArray//XL in terms of raw performance and scalability.
While it is suitable for most enterprise workloads, it may not provide the same level of performance as FlashArray//XL for highly transactional databases with demanding I/O requirements.
FlashArray//C :
The FlashArray//C is optimized for capacity and cost efficiency rather than raw performance.
It uses QLC NAND flash technology, which is more cost-effective but has lower endurance and performance compared to the TLC NAND used in FlashArray//X and FlashArray//XL.
This makes FlashArray//C unsuitable for highly transactional workloads like a medical records database.
Recommendation:
Given the customer's need for the "fastest possible array" and the highly transactional nature of their workload, FlashArray//XL is the best recommendation. Its ability to deliver consistent, low-latency performance at scale ensures that the medical records database will perform optimally under heavy transactional loads.
Reference:
FlashArray//XL Product Overview :
Pure Storage FlashArray//XL
Details the performance and use cases for FlashArray//XL.
FlashArray//X Product Overview :
Pure Storage FlashArray//X
Explains the capabilities of FlashArray//X for enterprise workloads.
FlashArray//C Product Overview :
Pure Storage FlashArray//C
Highlights the cost-efficient design of FlashArray//C for capacity-focused workloads.

NEW QUESTION # 33
A Storage Administrator has two //X50R3 FlashArrays. The two FlashArrays are located in different data centers with a network link between them. The ethernet link between data centers has a latency of 35 ms.
Which Purity feature will provide protection against a site failure with the lowest recovery point?

A. ActiveCluster
B. Snapshot replication
C. Local snapshots
D. ActiveDR

Answer: D

Explanation:
Given that the two FlashArrays are located in different data centers with a network link latency of 35 ms , the best Purity feature to provide protection against a site failure with the lowest recovery point is ActiveDR .
Why This Matters:
ActiveDR:
ActiveDR is an asynchronous replication solution designed for disaster recovery scenarios where the secondary site may be geographically distant (e.g., >10 ms latency).
It provides low RPOs (typically seconds to minutes) and supports fast failover and failback capabilities, ensuring minimal data loss and downtime.
With a 35 ms latency between sites, synchronous replication (e.g., ActiveCluster) is not feasible due to the high latency impacting performance.
Why Not the Other Options?
A . ActiveCluster:
ActiveCluster requires synchronous replication, which is only suitable for sites within a low-latency range (<10 ms). At 35 ms latency, ActiveCluster would cause significant performance degradation.
C . Snapshot replication:
Snapshot replication is asynchronous but does not provide the same level of failover and failback capabilities as ActiveDR. It is better suited for backup purposes rather than disaster recovery with low RPOs.
D . Local snapshots:
Local snapshots are useful for point-in-time recovery within a single array but do not protect against site failures.
Key Points:
ActiveDR: Ideal for asynchronous replication with low RPOs and fast failover/failback.
Latency Considerations: ActiveDR supports higher latencies (e.g., 35 ms) compared to synchronous solutions like ActiveCluster.
Disaster Recovery: Ensures protection against site failures with minimal data loss and downtime.
Reference:
Pure Storage FlashArray Documentation: "ActiveDR for Disaster Recovery" Pure Storage Whitepaper: "Meeting RPO and RTO Requirements with FlashArray" Pure Storage Knowledge Base: "Choosing the Right Replication Solution for High Latency"

NEW QUESTION # 34
An existing customer wants a new set of arrays with the following characteristics:
* Business critical workload that requires sub millisecond response times
* Synchronous replication configured to their secondary site
* Offload snapshots to a third location where they do not have a FlashArray Which solution will meet the customer's needs?
FlashArray//Xs with ActiveDR and CloudSnap

A. FlashArray//Cs with ActiveCluster and Snapshot Replication
B. FlashArray//Cs with ActiveDR and Snapshot Replication
C. FlashArray//Xs with ActiveCluster and CloudSnap

Answer: C

Explanation:
The customer has the following requirements:
Business-critical workload that requires sub-millisecond response times Synchronous replication configured to their secondary site Offload snapshots to a third location where they do not have a FlashArray The best solution to meet these needs is FlashArray//Xs with ActiveCluster and CloudSnap .
Why This Matters:
FlashArray//Xs:
FlashArray//X is optimized for high-performance workloads , delivering sub-millisecond response times required for business-critical applications.
ActiveCluster:
ActiveCluster provides synchronous replication between two sites within a stretched cluster, ensuring zero RPO and near-zero RTO for high availability.
CloudSnap:
CloudSnap offloads snapshots to cloud storage (e.g., AWS S3 or Azure Blob), enabling disaster recovery or archival at a third location without requiring an additional FlashArray.
Why Not the Other Options?
B . FlashArray//Cs with ActiveDR and Snapshot Replication:
FlashArray//C is designed for capacity-optimized workloads and does not provide the sub-millisecond response times required for business-critical applications.
ActiveDR provides asynchronous replication, which does not meet the requirement for synchronous replication.
C . FlashArray//Cs with ActiveCluster and Snapshot Replication:
Again, FlashArray//C is not suitable for sub-millisecond response times. Additionally, snapshot replication to a third location is less efficient than CloudSnap for offloading data to the cloud.
Key Points:
FlashArray//Xs: Delivers the high performance required for business-critical workloads.
ActiveCluster: Ensures synchronous replication for high availability across two sites.
CloudSnap: Provides cost-effective offsite protection by offloading snapshots to the cloud.
Reference:
Pure Storage FlashArray Documentation: "ActiveCluster with CloudSnap"
Pure Storage Whitepaper: "Disaster Recovery Strategies with FlashArray" Pure Storage Knowledge Base: "Using Protection Groups in Stretched Pods"

NEW QUESTION # 35
......

All FAAA_004 learning materials fall within the scope of this exam for your information. The content is written promptly and helpfully because we hired the most professional experts in this area to compile the FAAA_004 Preparation quiz. And our experts are professional in this career for over ten years. Our FAAA_004 practice materials will be worthy of purchase, and you will get manifest improvement.

FAAA_004 Practice Exam Pdf: https://www.actualvce.com/Pure-Storage/FAAA_004-valid-vce-dumps.html